Judgment Based On Compromise Agreement Immediately Executory





There are no specific rules in this jurisdiction governing third-party cases and that a party at the trial is generally free to obtain trial money. However, an agreement in which a lawyer agrees to pay the costs of a procedure to enforce the client`s rights is champertous (Roxas/Republic Real Estate Corp, G R No. 208205, June 1, 2016). A proposed contract is considered to be contrary to public policy because it is contrary to the fiduciary relationship between the lawyer and his client, whose weakness or discrimination may be exploited by the former (Nocom/Camerino, G R No. 182984, February 10, 2009). A general rule in this jurisdiction is that a judgment based on a compromise agreement is not questionable and immediately executed, unless an application is filed for fraud, error or coercion. (De los Reyes vs. Ugarte, 75 Phil. 505; Lapena vs. Morfe, R.G. No. L-10089, 31 July 1957) Virtual Legal Library Chanrobles It is extremely important to have a lawyer to assist you in the trial of the terms of your marriage contract or the agreed sentence.





Wilkinson-Finkbeiner`s lawyers have negotiated hundreds of family law judgments and know how to ensure that the terms on which you agree are in your favour and applicable. For more information on your family law case and how to obtain favourable terms for your marriage comparison contract or agreed judgment, click here to contact us now. In civil and commercial cases, the appeal period is generally set within 15 days of notification (d. h. official receipt of the service or notification) of the favourable opinion, judgment, final decision or order being appealed, or from the date of its most recent publication, if publication is required by law because of its effectiveness, or following the announcement of the rejection of a new procedure or decision duly submitted to the original court, in accordance with the applicable legislation of the court or agency. However, some types of remedies allow for longer delays, such as. (b) appeals against referral orders (i.e. orders that do not definitively resolve a case or have them), in accordance with section 65 of the court settlement, which is 60 days after notification of the order or decision.

The petitioner Ago failed with his payment and therefore, in 1958, respondent Grace Park Engineering, Inc. an out-of-court foreclosure procedure for the mortgage. To do so, the petitioner initiated civil action No. 53 before the Agusan Magistrates Court. The parties to the case reached a compromise agreement and presented it in writing to the court, signed by Pastor D. Ago and Engineering Grace Park, Inc.

Sosyal Paylaşım